The research on PLCs serve as the foundation for creating the STEM Academy Measurement
Tool and Rubric to be utilized in assisting schools in developing into STEM Academies, and
to give school personnel a framework for self-analysis of their status or growth as a STEM
Academy. PLCs are seen as promising change agents for teacher effectiveness and student
achievement (Stoll et al, 2006). PLCs are driven by shared and supportive leadership
(Hord, 1997) with the overall goal of success for all students. These major concepts of a
PLC are aligned to the STEM Academy Measurement Tool and Rubric's (STEM MT) embedded
promising practices, specifically, distributed leadership and culturally relevant
pedagogy. The focus on STEM education also brings into account additional promising
practices such as: inquiry-based teaching, technology-enhanced instruction, data-driven
instruction, and reflective teaching.
There is evidence to support the school
reform effort of PLCs. As Stoll et al. (2006) state, "There appears to be broad
international consensus that it (a PLC) suggests a group of people sharing and critically
interrogating their practice in an ongoing, reflective, collaborative, inclusive,
learning-oriented, growth-promoting way; operating as a collective enterprise" (p. 223).
They continue by concluding with "Developing professional learning communities (PLCs)
appears to hold considerable promise for capacity building for sustainable improvement"
(p. 221). The cultural change in a professional learning community requires "a shift from
isolation to a culture of conversation; from a focus on teaching students to a focus on
reciprocal teaching and learning by all members of the school community; and from
leadership by a few individuals to leadership that is embedded in and shared by all
members of the school community" (Roberts and Pruitt, 2003, p. 48).